There are only so many perspectives a photographer can take a picture from, its hard to get a shot from different angles. A painter has endless perspectives and can honestly imagine and create a painting from whichever angle they want to. You can literally add anything you want to, something a photographer can't do. Although, the pictures of nature or landscape are beautiful considering thats what was already naturally there. And to be giving a form of art with your own style yet not much creativity, is still amazing. There isn't too much you can get creative with.
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Landscape: Activity 3
Compare and contrast a landscape photograph with a landscape painting. Discuss the expressive possibilities of each medium using your examples to illustrate your argument. Choose your examples carefully as representative of the medium.
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Landscape: Activity 2
Find two landscape photographs that question social values or act as a metaphor for personal issues that the photographer is trying to express. Discuss whether the communication is clear or ambiguous and how this communication is conveyed.
The first picture shows a very natural and green area filled with trees and grass. And as you move outward and away from the center of this photo, buildings start to appear and fewer green is there. Then the buildings look almost like they are multiplying and increasing, where there are no more visible trees the farther from the center you go. When I saw this , I interpreted not just one meaning, but two. The first to come to mind was that although we have progressed over time and had advanced in many ways, such as technology, nature and earthy things are, and always will be, the center of life. The second meaning I interpreted from this photograph was that maybe the photographer was capturing how little we care about our environment, how technology and buildings are engulfing our earth, this has become acceptable to leave behind and its becoming a bigger problem while we advance farther and farther in technology. So I was thinking that maybe this was some kind of reality check, or a cry for help to save our planet.
The first picture shows a very natural and green area filled with trees and grass. And as you move outward and away from the center of this photo, buildings start to appear and fewer green is there. Then the buildings look almost like they are multiplying and increasing, where there are no more visible trees the farther from the center you go. When I saw this , I interpreted not just one meaning, but two. The first to come to mind was that although we have progressed over time and had advanced in many ways, such as technology, nature and earthy things are, and always will be, the center of life. The second meaning I interpreted from this photograph was that maybe the photographer was capturing how little we care about our environment, how technology and buildings are engulfing our earth, this has become acceptable to leave behind and its becoming a bigger problem while we advance farther and farther in technology. So I was thinking that maybe this was some kind of reality check, or a cry for help to save our planet.
The second picture shows a single tree surrounded by an abundance of water and some trees and mountains far in the background. I'm not sure if the photographer took this picture for just the pure beauty and rarity of this landscape or if there was some sort of meaning the photographer came up with while taking it. I usually can look at any picture and relate it to myself or to humans and society in general. What I see in this photograph is loneliness, and although the tree is abandoned and bare, away from anything like itself, it is rare and there is some sort of beauty and uniqueness. And what we see, especially in this society and generation, more and more teens are "feeling alone", for whatever reason, this feeling of unimportance exists, is spreading like a virus and is affecting teens around the world. And while they feel unimportant, dull, ugly, stupid, and a countless amount of other negative and untrue words, they fail to see the beauty of being separate and unique and their own person. No one seems to understand that being unusually rare and separate is what is truly fascinating.
Landscape: Activity 1
![]() |
| Bethlehem, Graveyard and Steel Mill - Walker Evans 1935 © Walker Evans Archive, 1994, The Metropolitan Museum of Art |
Discuss how effective Walker Evans has been in using a landscape image to communicate a point of view. Can this photograph be considered as Art? Give two reasons to support your answer.
So what you actually can see is some buildings in the background, they look like some type of factories. and then close-up is a graveyard/cemetery. I'm not really sure what the pictures meaning is or what the photographer was trying to represent in the photo but maybe its very literal and there are a lot of deaths or were a lot of deaths caused by these factories. Or maybe it is saying that if you are living you are working in these man made factories that have taken over most of what was left of nature, and when you're dead you can rest in what is actually left of nature in the grass or weeds. I say yes, this is definitely considered art, its very dreary and beautiful at the same time. I feel like almost anything can be considered art, if someone can be influenced or inspired or in awe and find their own meaning for it than I feel like it is art.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



